Skyfall, the
latest installment in the long-running saga based on Ian Fleming’s James Bond
character, forces the British action-hero to dig into his own past if he
intends to overcome a dangerous new foe. Director Sam Mendes (American Beauty
and Jarhead) ditches the inter-connected “Quantum” narrative of the last two
Bond films, Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace, in favor of an entirely new
storyline that plays on larger connections to the overarching character canon
and sets the stage for a more “refined” version of 007.
Considering
many fans have celebrated Craig’s rough and gritty interpretation of the iconic
character (currently enjoying a big screen 50th anniversary), did Mendes
successfully produce a James Bond film with all the essentials (a smart story,
memorable villain, and beautiful women) – while at the same time successfully
balancing the updated franchise direction with the re-introduction of a few
“traditional” Bond elements?
In Skyfall,
Mendes easily provides one of the more inspired James Bond installments to
date, painfully digging into the backstories of both 007 and M (Judi Dench) in
an attempt to say something meaningful about fallible people instead of simply
showcasing iconic characters in motion. Apart from its franchise appeal, Skyfall
would still be a sharp character-focused spy drama with plenty of intriguing as
well as thrilling set pieces; however, interestingly, the film’s various
attempts to fit Bond into a more “customary” mold (especially his womanizing
ways) are ultimately the weakest aspects of the endeavor. That said, while the
subtle course-corrections over-complicate a relatively straightforward story,
without adding much to the well-established character mold, they shouldn’t
distract too much from the quality of the larger Skyfall adventure.
After a
botched MI6 operation leads to a scramble across Istanbul, M gambles with
Bond’s life – in a desperate attempt to procure a stolen data disk containing
the identities of undercover operatives around the globe. Unfortunately, she
makes the wrong call and with Bond missing in action, the disk is lost. Months
later, when news of a deadly attack on MI6 headquarters catches up to Bond, who
has been hiding out in a seaside paradise “enjoying death,” the 00 agent is
pulled out of his self-mandated retirement to investigate the looming threat
and recover the disk. Unfortunately, the time away from his secret agent life
has left Bond worn-down and physically broken. Can 007 get up to speed in time
to stop terrorist leader Raoul Silva (Javier Bardem) – a dangerous man with an
equally mysterious connection to M and the MI6 agency?
Despite an
awkward pacing to the larger plot points and a core storyline that isn’t quite
as unique (or smart) as its premise, in a franchise that rarely takes the time
to consider Bond, the man, separate from his iconic characteristics (and
numerous sexual conquests), Skyfall successfully digs deeper than most entries
in the series – showcasing a version of the character that isn’t all polish and
slick one-liners. Instead, Mendes offers a Bond that is actually capable of
walking away from his responsibilities – drowning his anger and bitterness in
the bottom of tequila glasses instead of chasing after evildoers. It’s an
intriguing exploration of a familiar character’s limits (a subject that is
rarely explored in the film franchise). It isn’t until Bond sees the flaming
image of MI6 headquarters that he decides to put aside his grievances and get
back to work.
Unsurprisingly,
Craig revels in the chance to continue fleshing out Bond’s deep-seeded issues –
instead of just hitting series action beats. As mentioned, the resurrected Bond
presents a lot of fun opportunities for Craig to toe-the-line between his
Casino Royale character, a man that would smash through walls to accost a
fleeing bad guy, and a more “familiar” variation of 007 – basically, as Q (Ben
Whinshaw) says while describing Bond’s new Walther PPK-S, “less of a random
killing machine, more of a personal statement.” Still, for moviegoers who crave
hard-hitting action set pieces, Craig is afforded plenty of rough-and-tumble
butt kicking – especially during the film’s opening and finale sequences.
While the
last few Bond movies have delivered competent adventures, it’s been a while
since a modern Bond film included a villain that could stand shoulder to
shoulder with memorable rogues like Oddjob, Goldfinger, and Ernst Stavro
Blofeld. However, in spite of his homicidal tendencies, Skyfall terrorist Silva
is very fun to watch – relying on a smart juxtaposition of charm and ruthless
bloodlust to mirror Bond’s own demons. Unlike recent 007 villains who, even
with their own unique quirks, are little more than human faces superimposed
onto malevolent organizations, an extremely shaded performance from Bardem
will, for many, remind them of the “love to hate him” experience of Heath
Ledger’s Joker in The Dark Knight – cementing the character as a worthy
addition to the list of James Bond scoundrels.
A new batch
of supporting players also help to make everyone on the MI6 team relevant in
the moment, not just pre-mission exposition machines. For example, the
interactions between Bond and Ben Whishaw’s Q are especially entertaining – but
the character’s utility isn’t just limited to equipping 007 with gadgets, he’s
also integral to the larger movie narrative. Similar to Bond, Q, along with
characters like Gareth Mallory (Ralph Fiennes), and Eve (Naomie Harris), are
developed human beings with their own personal arcs that interweave with 007’s
secret agent antics. The result is a much richer world for Bond to inhabit –
one that, subsequently, gives audiences an amusing collection of fleshed out
personalities to enjoy.
Skyfall also
makes a strong argument for the impact of practical effects – especially in an
industry where eye-popping 3D visuals are increasingly becoming the go-to
approach for blockbuster filmmakers. Few of the action set pieces rely on CGI
fillers and the result is a grounded and immersive experience that, in lieu of
over-the-top gimmicks, allows for a number of entertaining cat and mouse
chases, hard-hitting hand-to-hand fisticuffs, and a surprisingly impactful
finale that’s as big on emotion as it is explosives. Additionally, Mendes, and
cinematographer Roger Deakins, convey a number of breathtaking images
(especially in Shanghai) that rank among the most captivating visuals ever
depicted in a Bond film (or quite possibly film in general).
Still, for
all the film does right, Skyfall‘s attempt to bring 007 in harmony with Fleming’s
iconic creation often work against the success of the experience – at times
dropping nuanced character exploration in favor of showing Bond engaging in his
usual “iconic” antics. There’s no shortage of sexual encounters in the film but
one in particular, a mid-movie shower rendezvous, serves absolutely no purpose
in developing the character or advancing the plot. Some viewers will no doubt
defend the scene by saying, “Bond is a womanizer” but, given the insight that
Mendes attempts to supply for the man behind the legend, it’s an abrupt shift
when the director then subverts the man and recklessly glorifies the legend for
no greater purpose.
Nevertheless,
as mentioned, Skyfall‘s few shortcomings are not enough to derail enjoyment of
the film. Scene to scene, moment to moment, the movie offers one of the richest
and most interesting Bond adventures – even if the core premise isn’t quite as
sharp as the various characters scrambling around the screen. For every awkward
misstep in Skyfall, Mendes provides several standout moments – resulting in an
especially entertaining and provocative 007 adventure. Great things are to be
expected in Spectre.
No comments:
Post a Comment